Trey Causey

Writing, advising, and seeking a next role in AI. Based in Seattle.

1 min

Source worksinprogress.co

The algorithm will see you now

AI isn't replacing radiologists

In many jobs, tasks are diverse, stakes are high, and demand is elastic. When this is the case, we should expect software to initially lead to more human work, not less. The lesson from a decade of radiology models is neither optimism about increased output nor dread about replacement. Models can lift productivity, but their implementation depends on behavior, institutions and incentives.

An excellent piece from Deena Mousa, lead researcher at OpenPhil, on why radiologists have not been replaced by AI despite the high accuracy and wide availability of radiology-specific models approved for clinical use.

The real takeaway, for me, though is wondering why people still listen to Hinton et al.’s predictions about the social and economic impact of AI? We need a “bitter lesson” for this kind of thing — most jobs aren’t just tasks and the implementation of technology into work is complex, political, and sociological.

Share on XShare on LinkedInMarkdown for an LLM

Send your thoughts

Name and email are optional.

At least 10 characters.

Was this helpful or interesting?

All notes

ESC
Type to search...